Based on GNM's “Ontogenetic
System of Tumors”, the widely propagated theory of metastasis that suggests
that cancer cells travel through the blood or lymph vessels and cause cancers
at new sites is, in Dr. Hamer's words, “pure academic fiction”. Cells in
general and cancer cells in particular can under no circumstances change their
histological structure or cross the germ layer threshold. For example, a lung
tumor cell, which is of endodermal origin, controlled from the brain stem (“old
brain”), and which proliferates during the conflict-active phase cannot transform
itself into a bone cell, which is of mesodermal origin, controlled from the
cerebrum (“new brain”), and which deteriorates during a conflict-active
decalcification process. In the scenario “lung cancer metastasizes into the
bones”, the lung cancer cells would actually be creating a hole (i.e., cell
meltdown!—the reverse of a cancer) in some bone in the body. We also have to
ask ourselves why cancer cells rarely “spread” to the closest neighboring
tissue, e.g., from the uterus to the cervix. If cancer cells travel via the
bloodstream, why is donated blood not screened for cancer cells? Why are there
not multitudinous tumors found in the walls of the blood vessels of cancer
patients?
On August 19, 2004, the
Canadian newspaper Globe and Mail published an article entitled,
“Researchers Chase Breast-Cancer Blood Test”, containing the revealing
statements, “The hunt for tumor cells in the bloodstream has taken 10 years… ”,
and, “until recently no technology existed to reliably pluck out the odd tumor
cell from the millions of red and white blood cells contained in a single vial
of human blood.” Besides the fact that the “chase” is far from over (as the
article indicates), doesn't this imply that the “metastasis” hypothesis was
misinforming the public and was scaring millions of cancer patients to death
for over four decades?
Dr. Hamer does not, of course,
dispute the fact of second cancers, but these subsequent tumors are not caused
by migrating cancer cells that miraculously transform into a different cell
type, but rather by new conflict shocks. New conflicts can be initiated by
additional traumatic life experiences or through diagnosis shocks. As already
mentioned, an unexpected diagnosis of cancer, or being told that it is
“metastasizing” can trigger a death-fright (causing lung cancer) or any other
type of diagnosis-related shock, causing new cancers in other parts of the
body. In many cases, these patients don't make it into the healing phase
because the severe state of stress weakens them to a point where they have very
little chance of surviving the highly toxic chemotherapy treatment.
The second most frequent
cancer after lung cancer is bone cancer. Dr. Hamer found that our bones are
biologically linked to our self-esteem and our self-worth. Thus, being told one
has a “life-threatening illness”, especially one that allegedly “spreads like
wildfire” through the body, is equated with: “now I am useless”, and the
bone(s), next to where we feel “useless” start to decalcify (in the case of
breast cancer often in the area of the sternum or the ribs). Just as with a
fractured bone, the purpose of the biological program (of the “disease”)
appears at the end of the healing phase. When the repair phase is completed,
the bone will be much stronger at that site, thus assuring that we are better
equipped for the eventuality of a new “self-devaluation conflict”.
GERMAN NEW MEDICINE® (GNM)
The New Medical Paradigm
Caroline Markolin, Ph.D.
No comments:
Post a comment